Adamsv. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 783 F.2d 589 (5th Cir.
1986)……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 53
All Asbestos-Related Cases, General Order (E.D. La. Nov.7,
1984)……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 33
Allen v. United States, 588 F. Supp. 247 (D. Utah 1984), rev’d
on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987)…………………………. 11, 127
Arnoldv. Eastern Air Lines, 681 F.2d 186 (4th Cir. 1982), cert.
denied, 460U.S. 1102 (1983)…………………………………………………………………. 91
Austinv. Johns-Manville, No. 75-764 (D.N.J. filed May 6,
1975)………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 85
Ayers v.TownshipofJackson, 55 U.S.L.W. 2620 (N.J. Sup.Ct.
May 7, 1987)………………………………………………………………………………………… 127
Blonder-Tongue Laboratories v.UniversityofIllinois, 402U.S.
313(1971)……………………………………………………………………………………………… 101
Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., 493 F.2d 1076 (5th
Cir. 1973)………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10, 12
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 106S. Ct.2548 (1986)……………………………………….. 75
Eash v. Riggins Trucking, Inc., 757 F.2d 557 (3d Cir. 1985)………………………. 70
Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co., 283U.S.494
(1931)……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 102
Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 761 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir.
1985)………………………………………………………………………………………………… 53, 105
Goldman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Nos. L 85-016, CU 82-
0794 (Ohio Ct. App. Lucas Cty., June 30, 1986) (Westlaw,
OhioCases Library)…………………………………………………………………………………. 6
Greenhaw v.LubbockCountyBeverage Ass’n, 721 F.2d 1019
(5th Cir. 1983)………………………………………………………………………………………. 102
Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 509 F. Supp. 1353 (E.D.
Tex.1981)………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6
Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 681 F.2d 334 (5th Cir.
1982)……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 93
Hayes v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., 513 F.2d 892 (10th Cir.
1975)……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 86
Helminski v. Ayerst Laboratory, 766 F.2d 208 (6th Cir.), cert.
denied, 106 S. Ct. 386 (1985)………………………………………………………………. 103
Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 776 F.2d 1492 (11th Cir.
1985)………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 91-93
In re AC & S, Inc., Case No. 86-3821 (6th Cir. Sept. 5, 1986)……………………. 75
In re “Agent Orange” Products Liability Litigation, 506 F.
Supp. 762 (E.D.N.Y. 1980), modified, 100 F.R.D. 718 (1983),
mandamus denied sub nom. In re Diamond Shamrock
Chemicals Co., 725 F.2d 858 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 465U.S.
1067(1984)…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 96
In re “Agent Orange” Products Liability Litigation, 597 F.
Supp. 740 (E.D.N.Y. 1984), affd, Nos. 1140 et al. (2d Cir. Apr.
21, 1987), rev’d on other grounds, Nos. 1085 et al. (2d Cir.
Apr. 21, 1987)…………………………………………………………………………………… 10, 84
In re “Agent Orange” Products Liability Litigation, 611 F.
Supp. 1223 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)…………………………………………………………………… 10
In re “Agent Orange” Products Liability Litigation, MDL No.
381 (unpublished opinions dated 5/8/79 and 10/18/83)………………………… 98
In re A. H. Robins Co., Dalkon Shield IUD Products Liability
Litigation, 406 F. Supp. 540 (J.P.M.D.L. 1975)………………………………………. 98
In re All Asbestos Cases, Memorandum Opinion (D. Md, Dec.
16, 1983)…………………………………………………………………………………… 71, 91, 107
In re Asbestos and Asbestos Insulation Material Products Li
ability Litigation, 431 F. Supp. 906 (J.P.M.D.L. 1977)……………………………. 98
In re Asbestos Litigation, 628 F. Supp. 774 (D.N.J. 1986)…………………….. 34, 92
In re Asbestos Litigation, Memorandum Order, Misc. No. 8482
(W.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 1983)…………………………………………………………………………. 75
In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation II, MDL No. 416
(J.P.M.D.L. 1980)……………………………………………………………………………………. 98
In re AsbestosSchool Products Liability Litigation, 606 F.
Supp. 713 (J.P.M.D.L. 1985)…………………………………………………………………… 98
In re Baltimore Asbestos Litigation, All Cases, Memorandum
and Order (D. Md. Dec. 16, 1983)…………………………………………………………… 51
In re Bendectin Products Liability Litigation, 749 F.2d 300 (6th
Cir. 1984)…………………………………………………………………………………………… 45,99
In re Bendectin Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 486
(S.D. Ohio Nov. 16, 1983), No. 85-3858, argued (6th Cir. Oct.
9, 1986)…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 99
In re Beverly Hills Fire Litigation, 695 F.2d 207 (6th Cir. 1982),
cert, denied, 461 U.S. 929 (1983)…………………………………………………………. 103
In re Federal Skywalk Cases, 680 F.2d 1175 (8th Cir.), cert.
denied, 459 U.S. 988(1982)…………………………………………………………………….. 94
In re Johns-Man ville Corp., Nos. 82 B 11,656-82 B 11.676
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. filed Aug. 26, 1982)……………………………………………………….. 9
In re Johns-Manville Corp., No. 82 B 11,656-76, slip op. at 28-29,
68 Bankr. 618 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 1986)………………………………………….. 12, 100
In re Johns-Manville Corp., 68 Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 1986)………………….. 9
In re Key Highway,Fairfield and Sparrows Point Shipyard—
Asbestos Cases, January 1986—Groups I & II, Memorandum
and Order (D. Md. Nov. 1, 1985)……………………………………………………………. 70
In re Massachusetts Asbestos Litigation, M.M.L. Nos. 1-5 (D.
Mass.May 8, 1986)……………………………………………………………………………….. 24
In re Massachusetts Asbestos Litigation, M.M.L. Nos. 1-5 (D.
Mass.Nov. 13, 1985)……………………………………………………………………………… 52
In re Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals “Bendectin” Litigation,
No. 85-3858 (6th Cir. argued Oct. 9, 1986)…………………………………………… 104
In re Multi-Piece Rim Products Liability Litigation, 464 F.
Supp. 969 (J.P.M.D.L. 1979)………………………………………………………………… 100
In re Northern District of California Dalkon Shield I.U.D.
Products Liability Litigation, 693 F.2d 847 (1982), cert.
denied, 459U.S. 1171 (1983)…………………………………………………………… 45, 94
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation, OAL Order Nos. 5, 7, 42, 45
(N.D.Ohio)……………………………………………………………………………………………. 66
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation, OAL Order No, 20 (N.D.Ohio
Aug. 30, 1984)………………………………………………………………………………………… 77
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation, OAL Order No. 29 (N.D.Ohio
Jan. 17, 1985)…………………………………………………………………………………………. 77
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation, OAL Order No. 32 (N.D.Ohio
Feb. 6, 1985)…………………………………………………………………………………………… 51
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation, OAL Order No. 40 (N.D.Ohio
Sept. 18, 1985)………………………………………………………………………………………… 51
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation, OAL Order No. 41 (N.D.Ohio
Oct. 31, 1985)…………………………………………………………………………………………. 62
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation, OAL Order No. 48 (N.D.Ohio
Aug. 8, 1986)………………………………………………. ,………………………….. ,………… 62
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation, OAL Order Nos. 49-51 (N.D.
OhioAug. 29-Sept. 4, 1986)…………………………………………………………………… 75
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation, OAL Order No. 56 (N.D.Ohio
Jan. 16, 1987)………………………………………………………………………………….. 62, 115
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation Insulation Case Groups I and II,
OAL Orders 14-16, 23 (N.D. Ohio May 23-Oct. 31,1984)……………………… 77
In re Ohio Asbestos Litigation Insulation Case Groups III and
IV, OAL Order No. 22 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 5, 1984)……………………………………… 77
In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 419 F. Supp. 712
(J.P.M.D.L. 1976)………………………………………………………………………………….. 100
In re Richardson-Merrell, Inc. “Bendectin” Products Liability
Litigation, MDL No, 486, Order Denying Motion for Judgment NOV and for a New Trial (S.D. Ohio Sept. 17, 1985),
Ct, App. No. 85-3858, argued (6th Cir. Oct. 9, 1986)…………………………….. 10
In re Richardson-Merrell, Inc. “Bendectin” Products Liability
Litigation (No. II), 533 F. Supp. 489 (J.P.M.D.L. 1982)………………………….. 98
In re School Asbestos Litigation, 789 F.2d 996 (3d Cir. 1986)……………… 94-96
In re Sugar Industry Antitrust Litigation, 399 F. Supp. 1397
(J.P.M.D.L. 1975)……………………………………………………………………………………. 99
In re Upjohn Co. Antibiotic “Cleocin” Products Liability Litiga
tion, 450 F. Supp. 1168 (J.P.M.D.L. 1978)……………………………………………. 100
Jacksonv. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 781 F.2d 394 (5th Cir.
1986), cert, denied, 106S. Ct. 3339 (1986)……………………………………….. 9, 53
Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc., No. M-84-193-CA (E.D.
Tex.Sept. 19, 1986), 782 F.2d 468 (5th Cir. 1986)… 11, 23, 28, 51, 63, 68,
79, 83, 94-97Johnstonv. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (W.D.Pa.Jan. 23,
1980) (unpublished order)………………………………………………………………………. 19
Kershaw v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 415 F.2d 1009 (5th Cir. 1969)…………………… 91
Lis v. RobertPackerHospital, 579 F.2d 819 (3d Cir.), cert.
denied, 439 U.S. 929 (1983)…………………………………………………………………. 102
McCrae v. Pittsburgh Coming Corp., 97 F.R.D. 490 (E.D. Pa.
1983)……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 92
Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd., 548 F. Supp. 357 (E.D. Pa.
1982), aff’d sub nom. Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines,
Ltd., 760 F.2d 481 (3d Cir. 1985)………………………………………… 88, 91-93, 106
Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 686 F.2d 570 (7th
Cir. 1982), cert denied, 459U.S. 1226 (1983)………………………………………… 93
Newman v, Johns-Manville, Civil Action No. M-79-124-CA (E.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 1984), mandamus denied sub nom. In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc., No. 84-2690 (5th Cir. Nov. 26,
1984)…………………………………………………………………………….. 28, 89, 91, 101, 105
Oxendine v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 506 A.2d 1100 (D.C.
1986).,………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10
Parklane Hosiery v. Shore, 439U.S.322 (1979)………………………………………. 101
Penn Central Securities Litigation, 325 F. Supp. 309
(J.P.M.D.L, 1971)…………………………………………………………………………………… 100
Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 447 F.2d 122 (2d Cir. 1987)………………………………………… 99
Rodriguez v. Banco Central, 790 F.2d 172 (1st Cir. 1986)……………………….. 102
Sterlingv. Velsicol, No. 78-1100, slip op., Findings of Fact Nos.
628-642 (W.D. Tenn. filed Aug. 1,1986)…………………………………………………. 10
Sweeney v. Acands, C85-2984 (N.D.Ohio1985)……………………………………….. 22
Tefft v. A.C. & S., Inc. slip op. (W.D. Wash. Sept. 15, 1982)……………………… 92
Tippens v. Celotex Corp., 805 F.2d 949 (11th Cir. 1986)……………………………… 6
Wells v. Raymark Industries, Inc., No. 87-1016-K (D. Kan. filed
Jan. 12, 1987)………………………………………………………………………………………….. 82
Wheelahan v. G. D. Searle & Co., No. 86-1598 (4th Cir. Mar. 16,
1987)………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 104
Wilsonv. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 107 F.R.D. 250 (S.D.Tex.
1985)…………………………………………………………………………………………… 91,92, 106
Yandle v. PPG Industries, 65 F.R.D. 566 (E.D. Tex. 1974)…………………………. 94
Yung v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 789 F.2d 397 (6th Cir. 1986)……… 102, 103